Chile Reopens Investigation into Pablo Neruda’s Mysterious Death

Fourteen years after initial queries, Chile’s Court of Appeals mandates the reopening of the investigation into Nobel laureate Pablo Neruda’s death, challenging the narrative of his demise post-Pinochet’s coup and rekindling debates on state terrorism and historical accountability.

Reopening the Investigation

In a significant judicial development, the First Chamber of the Court of Appeals in Santiago, Chile, has ordered the reopening of the investigation into the death of the country’s esteemed poet and Nobel laureate, Pablo Neruda. This decision comes 12 days after the military coup led by Augusto Pinochet in September 1973, a tumultuous period marked by political upheaval and state-sponsored violence. The directive to revisit the case underscores a persistent pursuit of truth by Neruda’s family and the Communist Party, to which Neruda was a lifelong affiliate.

The unanimous decision to reactivate the inquiry emerged from the acknowledgment that prior investigations had not exhausted all avenues to determine the circumstances of Neruda’s death conclusively. The poet, renowned for his work “Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair,” died under suspicious conditions at the Santa María Clinic in Santiago on September 23, 1973, just as he was preparing to seek exile in Mexico.

For years, the official stance attributed Neruda’s death to complications arising from advanced prostate cancer. However, this narrative has been contested by those close to Neruda, including his driver and personal secretary, Manuel Araya, whose allegations of foul play first brought public attention to the possibility of Neruda being poisoned by agents of the dictatorship.

This reopening not only breathes new life into a longstanding quest for clarity but also aligns with broader efforts across Latin America to confront past injustices and scrutinize the actions of authoritarian regimes. Similar investigations have been launched in countries like Argentina and Uruguay, where efforts to uncover the truth about the disappearances and deaths under military dictatorships continue to unfold.

Judge’s Initial Resistance

Judge Paola Plaza, tasked with discerning whether Neruda succumbed to his illness or was indeed a victim of poisoning, initially closed the case in September and resisted reopening it in December. However, the persistence of Neruda’s family and the Communist Party, appealing for a thorough examination, has now favored the judicial system.

Elizabeth Flores, the family’s attorney, hailed the decision as a vindication of their prolonged battle for transparency, emphasizing the critical nature of the inquiry not just for Neruda’s legacy but for historical truth. Juan Andrés Lagos, from the Communist Party, highlighted the decision’s significance in reaffirming allegations of state terrorism during Pinochet’s regime, suggesting a broader context of dictatorial oppression and human rights violations.

Intriguingly, the investigation took a dramatic turn in 2017 when a panel of international experts discovered traces of “clostridium botulinum,” a bacterium causing botulism, in Neruda’s remains. This finding contradicted the longstanding cancer narrative and suggested external intervention, potentially validating claims of Neruda’s poisoning. This bacterium, typically found in soil or improperly preserved canned foods, can lead to severe neurological issues and death, further complicating the narrative of Neruda’s demise.

The court’s latest ruling mandates new lines of inquiry, including forensic analysis of the death certificate and additional witness statements. Most crucially, it calls for a comprehensive review of the forensic findings by the international panels from McMaster and Copenhagen Universities, aiming to interpret the presence of the botulinum toxin in Neruda’s body conclusively.

Demand for Reconciliation

This judicial directive reflects a growing demand within Chile and the broader Latin American region for reconciliation with the past. By revisiting cases like Neruda’s, societies are grappling with the legacies of their authoritarian histories, seeking justice for victims of state violence and striving for historical accuracy.

Also read: Chile’s Unified Front Against Crime Showcases President Boric’s Commitment to Security

As this investigation moves forward, it symbolizes more than the quest to determine the cause of Neruda’s death; it represents a collective endeavor to confront the shadows of dictatorship, challenge narratives imposed by oppressive regimes, and affirm the resilience of truth in the face of historical obfuscation. This renewed probe into Neruda’s final days underscores the enduring significance of his literary and political legacy and reflects the broader struggle for justice and transparency in a region still coming to terms with the scars of its authoritarian past.