Ecuador's Divided Polls Still Suggest Noboa's Likely Runoff Triumph
Recent polling data reveals an electorate deeply divided, with President Daniel Noboa poised for another triumph if a runoff occurs. Some surveys even predict an outright first-round win, but most indications point to a second-round scenario for a final, clear resolution.
A Repeated Showdown in a Time of Crisis
After governing for only a short term, Ecuador’s President Daniel Noboa now looks poised to capture a full four-year mandate in the presidential race scheduled for February 9. According to multiple polls, his fiercest competitor is Luisa Gonzalez, the leading figure of the Revolución Ciudadana movement and political heir to former President Rafael Correa. The contest resembles the 2023 election, where Gonzalez surpassed other candidates in round one but lost to Noboa in the runoff. A brilliant plus charismatic business heir, Noboa exploited the public’s frustration with traditional politicians.
The impact matters more than ever this time. Ecuadorians face skyrocketing violence from drug cartels, persistent economic stagnation that has lasted over five years, and growing distrust in public institutions. Despite these challenges—and concerns that the next government might struggle to secure a full term—polling data shows Noboa edging ahead, possibly on track to avoid a second-round upset if he crosses certain thresholds. Yet other polls forecast he may not achieve the 40% advantage needed to clinch an immediate victory.
A pair of recent polls underscore the uncertainty. One Comunicaliza survey suggests Noboa holds 47.1% of valid votes against Gonzalez’s 39.5%. Another poll, by Negocios & Estrategias, flips the script, indicating Gonzalez stands at 45% while Noboa trails at 40%, which would prompt a runoff. Meanwhile, an Ipsos poll positions Noboa as high as 50% support—enough to close the election in a single round—though critics warn of the “unreliability” of Ecuador’s polls in recent years. Political analysts thus remain divided.
President Noboa gained popularity from his firm leadership style and his focus on public safety. He took quick action in his brief tenure and declared a “war” on criminal organizations. The initiative targeted drug gangs who move cocaine through Ecuador’s territory into other nations. Homicide rates stabilized somewhat, but January 2025 is on pace to become the nation’s deadliest month to date, raising the possibility of last-minute security failures upending Noboa’s re-election push. At just 37 years old, he is an unusually young leader in Ecuador, often portrayed as an outsider unshackled by traditional political elites. But critics accuse him of harnessing state resources for campaigning and using friendly judicial or electoral authorities to sideline opponents.
Luisa Gonzalez connects to the extensive influence of correísmo. Rafael Correa, who led Ecuador from 2009 to 2017, remains a divisive person. His fans praise him for his work on roads and social programs. But critics despise him as a power-hungry leader with several corruption charges. The Gonzalez campaign emphasizes her connection to Correa’s methods and her promise to bring back the relative peace of past times. She has decried the “neoliberal” direction post-Correa presidents have supposedly embraced, blaming that orientation for the surge in crime and economic malaise.
The final results hinge on voter turnout, unexpected events, and candidates’ ability to motivate the electorate. The race proceeds to a runoff if neither candidate hits 50% or 40% with a 10-point margin. Many experts believe Noboa holds an edge in a two-way race. But regions that lean left could unite behind Gonzalez plus shift the final vote into a close battle. The pressure rises as the next debate draws near. A good debate performance from Gonzalez to challenge Noboa’s stance on crime control, along with his past business results, could tighten the race once again.
Security and Economic Woes Fuel Public Anxiety
While personalities dominate the headlines, the fundamental backdrop is a crisis-ridden Ecuador. Over the past few years, organized crime exploded as local gangs expanded their reach, forming alliances with Mexican, Colombian, and even Albanian cartels to control cocaine routes. According to many observers, once considered an oasis of tranquility in Latin America, Ecuador has become one of the most violent nations in the region. Statistics show that homicide rates have soared from historically low levels into the highest annual increments in decades.
Critics fault successive governments for failing to anticipate the infiltration of transnational drug networks, leaving prisons overcrowded and poorly supervised, thus allowing gang leaders to orchestrate operations from behind bars. Noboa’s administration made high-profile arrests and allocated extra funds to security forces, but these moves had limited immediate impact. Some short-term successes—like a 16% drop in reported murders from a record 2023 baseline—have done little to quell broader anxieties. A high-casualty incident could jar the electorate, undermining Noboa’s progress claims.
At the same time, the economy sputters. Ecuador’s GDP per capita has shrunk for at least five years, pushing unemployment upward and fueling outward migration. Thousands of Ecuadorians, despairing over crime and joblessness, have attempted perilous treks to the U.S. border. Others look to relocate to Spain or other countries with more stable prospects. Public resentment boils over as campaigns revolve around who can restore security, rekindle the economy, and salvage Ecuador’s battered institutions.
Gonzalez pledges a government-led development approach reminiscent of Correa’s era: large-scale public investment in infrastructure, job creation, and social programs to stimulate growth. She references young Ecuadorians’ “dramatic exodus” as a moral imperative to act quickly. Her opponents focus on claims of corruption that cast a shadow over the final years of Correa’s administration plus raise doubts about the treasury’s ability to pay for such a large stimulus plan. A simultaneous look at Noboa’s agenda shows his focus on business-friendly changes along with really close ties to the International Monetary Fund. He states that foreign investment will flow back when the administration keeps steady rules, maintains security, and reduces red tape.
For many Ecuadorians, these different views show a fundamental split in beliefs. A segment of citizens want to return to the perceived safety of correísmo with large social programs and direct public aid. Others dread the old ills of potential overreach and worry that combining large state apparatus and questionable fiscal discipline could lead to long-term instability. Noboa’s approach, by contrast, aligns with a more market-oriented perspective. Still, skeptics note that after just over a year in office, the promised economic turnaround has yet to take hold.
An Unpredictable Electoral Field
Despite a “two-horse race” narrative, Ecuador’s system—where the state subsidizes campaign advertising for qualifying candidates—encourages a dizzying array of challengers. For this election, 16 presidential candidates have filed to run. The lion’s poll share is in the low single digits, but their presence can still matter. If a candidate makes a late push, votes could shift away from Noboa or Gonzalez, plus make a first-round victory complex.
A primary legislative race occurs at the same time. National Assembly seats remain open as all parties try to win enough seats to pass reforms or block the opposition. Governance in Ecuador has traditionally been hobbled by friction between the executive and legislative branches. Observers believe that a cohesive majority around Noboa or the correísta bloc would be essential to push through needed reforms on security, the economy, and anti-corruption measures.
Polling companies also caution about historically “remarkably unreliable” surveys. In the 2023 cycle, the primary candidate’s lead shrank fast in the last weeks as voters who had felt indifferent, plus undecided citizens, went to vote. The public’s distrust in formal establishments adds to this instability, with over 70 % of Ecuadorians thinking the nation is moving in the wrong direction. That disillusionment may manifest in surprising ways: a surge for a protest candidate or a spate of blank/void ballots that complicates the scenario.
Yet the sheer magnitude of the country’s problems may nudge voters to choose between the most prominent alternatives. Noboa is widely recognized for ambition and rhetorical flair, while Gonzalez has the disciplined backing of the well-organized Revolución Ciudadana movement. Their dynamic—populist appeals on security from Noboa and pledges to restore a robust welfare state from Gonzalez—dominates the conversation. The other 14 candidates just don’t get enough attention or resources to stand out in all the noise.
A Fork in the Road for Ecuador’s Future
Whatever the outcome on February 9, the next Ecuadorian president faces daunting tasks that will shape the country’s trajectory. Suppose Noboa secures a decisive victory, possibly even in a first-round upset. In that case, he will attempt to expand upon his approach of courting foreign investment, forging security pacts with external allies (particularly the United States), and rolling out incremental economic reforms. However, skeptics question whether that approach can dent the power of cartels without more profound structural change. They also fear that Noboa, lacking a strong party base, could overextend executive authority or rely on an uneasy coalition in the National Assembly.
If Gonzalez wrests control of the presidency, she will likely pivot Ecuador toward a correísta framework, championing large-scale public projects and potentially realigning foreign policy with other left-leaning Latin American governments. She might revise or even discard Noboa’s brutal tactics on organized crime in favor of negotiation or restructured security apparatuses. While many older voters recall Correa’s tenure as a time of visible infrastructure improvements, others remain wary of a perceived authoritarian streak and worry about how new social programs would be funded in an economy starved for revenue.
In either case, the makeup of the legislature matters a lot. If the president’s party obtains the biggest group, it must partner with minor parties and pass essential reforms. This kind of steady government is precisely what many Ecuadorians want because they’re very tired of the nonstop cycle of incomplete terms and temporary leaders. The last four years alone have seen repeated elections triggered by constitutional mechanisms meant to break the executive-legislative deadlock, but that approach often yields more uncertainty.
Many business leaders, foreign observers, and everyday citizens agree that the top priorities are restoring public order, spurring economic growth, and implementing anti-corruption measures. “Governability,” as local analysts frame it, emerges as the watchword. Without it, the country’s institutional fabric—already weakened by corruption scandals and factional showdowns—may fray further. The mounting exodus of skilled workers underscores a real worry that Ecuador cannot remain an attractive place to live or invest unless the next administration demonstrates competence and unity.
Further fueling tension is the matter of migrants. Ecuador’s economic slump has propelled thousands to try their luck elsewhere, particularly crossing into the U.S. Reports detail entire families risking the Darién Gap or other perilous routes. Whichever candidate prevails must contend with large-scale migration’s social and economic repercussions. The crisis affects national security and cartel activities that disrupt citizens’ lives.
Partners abroad, plus the U.S., monitor the election very closely. A second Noboa term appeals to U.S. officials as a real chance to expand teamwork in drug control and shared intelligence. However, a Gonzalez victory could move alliances toward left-leaning countries like Brazil or Colombia. These policy changes affect trade next to foreign money flows, plus the battle against international crime.
The future of Ecuador’s shaky democracy depends on this vote to create stable rule for the full four-year term. A constitution reshaped by past populist changes lets voters recall presidents and also dissolve Congress under specific regulations. If the next president fails to manage alliances or alienates the electorate, history could repeat itself, leading to another snap election.
Political scientists warn that a cyclical pattern of half-completed terms, caretaker administrations, and fractious politics can deepen cynicism. Voters crave continuity if only to allow one government enough time to implement policies. The potential for a strong show of legislative support for either Noboa or Gonzalez might ensure the new administration can pass budget measures and reorganize the security forces to tackle violent groups. But if the legislature remains splintered, achieving these goals will become vastly more complex.
As the campaign nears its final stretch, major contenders calibrate their messages. Noboa accentuates progress on security, capitalizing on a drop in homicides from the worst peaks while also unveiling investment deals to spark job creation. Gonzalez rails against the “failed neoliberal experiment,” promising to restore social welfare programs that she argues earlier governments neglected. Both try to present actual solutions to frustrated voters.
A runoff appears likely despite unclear poll predictions plus major shifts. The race will turn intense if this happens and the candidates must seek support from smaller political figures as well as try to bring together different factions. When the second round starts, a wave of nasty campaign ads will pop up with claims of corruption and power abuse that may really take attention away from the actual policy talks. Such aggressive exchanges will test how much respect remains in Ecuador’s democratic system.
Many pressures currently affect the country – rising crime, economic troubles, and weak institutions – so this vote could reshape Ecuador’s path in significant ways. The next leader must build a steady alliance or face more political deadlock. A clear win by Noboa leads some supporters to expect focused leadership to control violence and fix the economy. However, others worry that his methods would rely too much on force instead of including all social groups. If Gonzalez wins, one could see a near-total rollback of specific neoliberal policies, replaced by a revival of correísta economic nationalism. But the specter of corruption looms.
In a tense area with many political conflicts, Ecuador’s future situation will affect other nations in South America. The outcomes in Ecuador matter a lot to bordering countries like Colombia along with Peru, which face similar challenges with drug-related violence plus threats to public safety, as the entire region must tackle these security issues together. Investors watch warily to see if the business environment remains stable or policies pivot toward heavier state intervention. Meanwhile, thousands of ordinary people in Quito, Guayaquil, and other cities hope a fresh mandate might finally create prosperity and safety.
Also Read: São Paulo University’s Rise: A Win With Regional Challenges Ahead
The country stands before a key vote while Ecuadorians must decide between two paths: a highly untested Noboa, who offers continuity, and Gonzalez’s leftist agenda. The latest polls show very close numbers, anxious voters, and unpredictable situations. All that is clear is that come February 9—and potentially a second round soon after—the Andean nation must plot a new course in a high-stakes duel whose consequences may linger for decades.
