Learning Cannot Justify Minor Sexualization in Latin Music Lyrics

Colombian artist Karol G’s response to backlash over lyrics in her song “+57” raises concerns about accountability in music. While she claims she’s still learning, using this as a defense for lyrics that some argue sexualize minors is unacceptable.

Public Influence Demands Responsibility

Artists like Colombia’s Karol G have an undeniable influence, and their work can shape cultural attitudes and perceptions. With her music reaching millions, the impact of her words on fans is profound. Her recent release, “+57,” featuring other prominent Colombian artists, sparked immediate backlash for lyrics that many felt crossed a line, hinting at the sexualization of minors. This kind of content is something other than something that can be considered a misunderstanding. The power of words, especially in music, is real—and artists must be aware of the responsibility that comes with their reach.

Karol G fired back against those criticisms by either providing context to her lyrics or addressing how everyone reacted: they flipped it, and Karol vented. That said, particular lyrics did rub many listeners the wrong way. This line, about a “Mamacita” since fourteen years old, was especially troubling for many, and organizations such as the Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (I.C.B.F.) expressed fear that expressions like this could unwittingly contribute to child commodification throughout the country. Considering that music is a vessel for emotions, it goes without saying artists, in particular public figures, have to be mindful of their words.

The Dangers of Minimizing Harmful Content

To dismiss legitimate criticism with the attribution that lyrics were twisted or misconstrued is to minimize real damage. The words may not be taken, but they have consequences, particularly if they’re concerned with issues such as youth sexualization. This is not about cutting off creative license; this is about being aware of the obligation of power. In places like Colombia, where child exploitation is a genuine problem, any language that might seem to romanticize or trivialize the issue is concerning. As public figures, artists need to consider how these topics may affect listeners, particularly in a society that continues to face these challenges.

When such concerns are brushed off, it risks creating an environment where vulnerable groups aren’t fully protected. For Karol G and her collaborators, it’s not enough to defend “+57” as a simple celebration of Colombian culture. It includes references that might be read as unhealthy or inappropriate, knowingly or not and steps into dangerous territory. When influential figures dismiss these concerns, it sends a troubling message to fans and the industry, suggesting that this kind of language is acceptable. This sets a poor standard, especially for young fans who admire these artists.

When “Learning” Becomes a Deflection

Karol G’s reply that she’s “still learning” what a good artist she is might sound authentic, but it also sounds like a plea for relief. To say they are “learning” doesn’t cut it when you’re dealing with something as grave as the sexualization of children. Growth as an artist should mean more than a passive response—it should involve actively making changes to prevent similar issues in the future rather than using “learning” to deflect responsibility in the present.

It’s easy for public figures to hide behind the idea of growth without genuinely recognizing the harm that may have been caused. Fans deserve more than an apology that pushes accountability onto the public’s supposed “misinterpretation.” Karol G’s response would carry more weight if she directly addressed the lyrics and the concerns they raised. Blaming the public for misunderstanding creates a barrier to genuine growth and stops meaningful dialogue.

Accountability in Music

The only way artists are ever going to improve is if they are open to criticism and take tangible actions toward accountability. One key to that is not to take offense to fan concerns about something as crucial as children’s safety. Moving forward, Karol G and her collaborators can show real responsibility by being mindful of language that could harm or exploit vulnerable groups.

A meaningful response involves recognizing when mistakes have been made and understanding why specific topics upset listeners. Artists can still celebrate their culture and individuality through music without crossing lines that cause harm. This should be supported by the whole entertainment industry and let artists know their power and reach. If this criticism can be used as an exercise in wordplay by Karol G, J Balvin, and the rest of the “+57” team, so be it.

Also read: Why Colombia’s Government Should Not Bow to ELN’s Demands for “Unified Policy”

Ultimately, “learning” should never be an excuse for ignoring accountability. Karol G’s apology may be a start, but it feels complete with a deeper look at the issue and a commitment to change.