Latin America Under Trump 2025: Ports, Prisons, and Tariffs Rewrite Regional Politics

From Panama’s canal ports to El Salvador’s megaprison, the Trump White House and Marco Rubio are reshaping U.S.-Latin ties. Tariffs, sanctions, and Caribbean strikes test sovereignty, dividing leaders from Brazil to Colombia while Venezuela looms in 2025’s hemispheric power struggle.

Americas First, with a Short Fuse

In January, Marco Rubio took charge at the U.S. State Department and pushed an Americas First reset, arguing in The Wall Street Journal that the hemisphere would no longer be sidelined. In February, his first official trip touched five countries across Latin America and the Caribbean. The tempo soon became unmistakably Donald Trump: allies get favors, critics get pressure. Javier Milei in Argentina and Nayib Bukele in El Salvador have embraced the MAGA wavelength.

That pressure was formalized when the White House marked the Monroe Doctrine anniversary with a Trump corollary stressing U.S. control of the Western Hemisphere. In Latin America, such language triggers institutional memory. Work in Latin American Research Review and Journal of Democracy warns that external tutelage can harden polarization by turning policy disputes into sovereignty crises.

In January, Colombian President Gustavo Petro reversed his stance on accepting U.S. deportation flights after Trump threatened punitive tariffs. The lever was immediate: Colombia is the biggest exporter of cut flowers to the United States. For workers who pack stems into boxes, a tariff threat is not theory; it is fewer shifts, less cash, and another reminder that borders are managed through livelihoods.

Ports, Prisons, and Political Loyalty

In Panama, leverage arrived through geography. After Rubio’s February visit, Panama moved to meet U.S. demands that CK Hutchison, a Hong Kong conglomerate, relinquish its stake in two ports tied to the Panama Canal. Analyst Christina Guevara argues that Washington often blurs Chinese commerce near the canal with control of the canal itself, a blur Panamanians read through a long history of intervention.

El Salvador shows the reward side. Nayib Bukele offered to detain migrants deported from the United States, pairing deportation with his mass-incarceration agenda and a massive prison opened in 2023. The White House later sent planeloads of migrants there despite court resistance and reportedly paid $6 million. Noah Bullock of Cristosal warns that weak safeguards invite abuse. For families, the policy question narrows to one fear: whether a loved one can be traced once detention begins.

In Argentina, the administration chose a carrot. The United States promised $20 billion in support if Javier Milei’s party wins midterms, a pledge that analysts like Keith Johnson say looks more political than systemic, especially compared with Mexico in 1995. The symbolism is deliberate: Milei headlines CPAC and even handed a gilded chainsaw to Elon Musk. In the region, it reads as a price tag on ideological alignment.

Brazil has tested the opposite lesson. In September, its Supreme Court convicted former President Jair Bolsonaro and seven associates for plotting a coup, sentencing Bolsonaro to 27 years. The case unfolded amid U.S. pressure, including sanctions on a Brazilian justice and higher tariffs. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva refused to bend, making sovereignty central to his politics. Yet polarization persists; surveys show a slight majority distrust the court, a risk flagged in Latin American Politics and Society.

Caribbean Strikes and the Caracas Shadow

Then came the sea. In September, U.S. forces began striking boats in the Caribbean, saying they were targeting suspected drug smugglers while offering no public evidence and no authorization from Congress. The toll has passed 100 dead. For coastal communities, the policy is not abstract counter-narcotics strategy; it is the fear that a routine crossing ends in fire. Many analysts see a possible runway toward harder action against Venezuela.

The fallout hit Gustavo Petro. After condemning the strikes, he and members of his family were sanctioned in October. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed the move as a response to cartels, and Trump later attacked Petro from Mar-a-Lago, accusing Colombia of operating major cocaine factories. Petro answered by invoking territorial history, arguing Texas and California were taken by invasion. In the Andes and beyond, such arguments land as both provocation and reminder.

Now attention turns to Caracas, where Venezuela’s Nobel Peace Prize-winning opposition leader backs Trump’s military posture. Some in Washington reportedly cite the 1989 invasion of Panama, but former vice minister Carlos Ruiz-Hernández says the analogy breaks: Venezuela lacks the basing and treaty rights the United States had then, and its scale and terrain raise the costs of force. International Security has long warned that coercion can deliver short-term compliance while deepening backlash, especially when China and Russia can sell the story as imperial relapse. In 2025, Latin America is pushed to choose, and ordinary people pay in ports, prisons, flower fields, and dark water. The hemisphere feels smaller, and more brittle.

Also Read: Latin America War on Drugs Returns as Terror Labels Spread