El Salvador’s Third Fiscal Amnesty: A Path Forward?
El Salvador’s Legislative Assembly has approved a third fiscal amnesty, forgiving fines and interest on late tax payments. This measure, implemented under President Nayib Bukele’s administration, aims to address economic concerns and help small taxpayers. But will it suffice?
El Salvador’s Legislative Assembly approved a fiscal amnesty for forgiving fines and interest on late tax payments, marking the third measure passed since 2022. Officially named the “Special and Transitory Law Granting Facilities for Voluntary Compliance with Tax, Customs, and Other Fines,” this initiative received overwhelming support, with 57 out of 60 lawmakers voting.
According to legislative authorities, the law gives citizens who have fallen behind on their taxes the opportunity to settle their obligations without the burden of additional penalties. The amnesty will be in effect for 90 days and, for the first time, includes the forgiveness of interest on traffic fines.
This development is significant because it relieves the financial burden on citizens and reflects President Nayib Bukele’s broader strategy to stabilize El Salvador’s economy. Bukele, whose second consecutive term as president has raised eyebrows due to constitutional prohibitions, is now seeking to shift his administration’s focus from tackling gang violence to addressing economic woes. However, as the country embarks on this path, questions remain: Will fiscal amnesty solve El Salvador’s underlying economic challenges?
A New Opportunity for Delinquent Taxpayers
El Salvador’s Legislative Assembly, dominated by Bukele’s allies, has proactively addressed many citizens’ financial strain. This latest amnesty, covering a 90-day window, allows taxpayers with accumulated debts to settle them without fear of punitive fines or accumulating interest. In an added twist, it also includes traffic fines, a move that may resonate with a significant portion of the population, given the widespread issue of unpaid traffic penalties in the country.
This is not the government’s first rollout of such a measure. In 2022 and 2023, previous fiscal amnesties allowed thousands of Salvadorans to settle their debts. According to the Legislative Assembly, 25,825 citizens took advantage of the 2022 amnesty, while 36,000 benefited from the 2023 iteration. The most recent program alone raised around $100 million, with 57% of that revenue from small taxpayers.
However, while these figures indicate success, they also underscore a critical challenge: El Salvador’s fiscal system may not be sustainable without recurrent amnesties. The frequent implementation of such policies raises concerns about whether they are merely stopgap measures rather than long-term solutions to a much deeper economic problem.
Bukele’s Economic Focus
In his second inaugural address on June 1, 2023, President Bukele clarified that his administration’s priorities were evolving. Having focused primarily on security during his first term—mainly through his controversial crackdown on gang violence—Bukele intends to turn his attention to the country’s economic challenges.
“Now that we’ve addressed the most urgent issue, which was security, we’re going to focus fully on important problems, starting with the economy,” Bukele declared. This pivot comes after the president famously referred to gang violence as a “cancer” plaguing El Salvador, one that he claims his government has largely eradicated.
Bukele’s administration, with its iron-fisted approach to crime, has indeed achieved notable success in reducing the country’s homicide rate. However, as security has improved, the country’s economic difficulties have come to the forefront. For many Salvadorans, job insecurity, high living costs, and stagnant wages remain daily realities despite the government’s aggressive efforts to boost security and infrastructure.
Fiscal amnesties can be seen as part of Bukele’s broader economic strategy, designed to bring much-needed relief to citizens and boost government revenue. Yet, as critics point out, such measures might have limited long-term impact unless paired with more substantial reforms.
Public Response: Economic Concerns Still Loom Large
Despite the government’s emphasis on fiscal amnesty as a tool for economic relief, public opinion suggests that Salvadorans remain deeply concerned about the economy. A recent survey by the University Institute of Public Opinion (Iudop), part of the Jesuit-run Central American University, revealed that 73.7% of Salvadorans believe the country’s primary problem is related to economic factors. Additionally, 25.8% stated that Bukele’s most significant failure during his time in office was managing the economy.
These numbers highlight the growing sense of discontent among Salvadorans, who, despite appreciating the crime reduction, feel that their day-to-day economic struggles have been neglected. The global economic downturn, exacerbated by inflation and rising food prices, has only added to the pressure.
Bukele’s administration faces the difficult task of balancing the progress made in security with the urgent need to revitalize the economy. While fiscal amnesties may offer temporary relief, they do little to address the structural issues that continue to hamper economic growth in El Salvador, such as low productivity, underemployment, and a lack of diversification in critical industries.
Can Fiscal Amnesty Drive Long-Term Growth?
El Salvador’s repeated use of fiscal amnesty raises critical questions about its long-term effectiveness. While the measures provide immediate financial relief to taxpayers and generate quick revenue for the government, they may also encourage a culture of non-compliance. If citizens come to expect periodic amnesties, there could be less incentive to pay taxes on time, potentially leading to even greater fiscal instability in the future.
Furthermore, the government’s reliance on amnesty programs reflects its broader struggle to implement comprehensive tax reforms that would ensure sustainable revenue streams. The country’s economy relies heavily on remittances, with millions of Salvadorans living abroad, primarily in the United States, sending money back to their families. While these remittances are a lifeline for many, they do little to stimulate domestic economic growth or create long-term employment opportunities.
Bukele’s government may need to consider deeper fiscal reforms to address El Salvador’s economic challenges. This could involve overhauling the tax system, improving transparency in government spending, and investing in sectors that can create jobs and boost productivity. Fostering a business-friendly environment that encourages local and foreign investment will be crucial in driving sustainable growth.
While fiscal amnesty may provide short-term relief, it is unlikely to be a panacea for El Salvador’s economic woes. Bukele seeks to consolidate his political legacy, so his administration must move beyond temporary fixes and focus on building a resilient and diversified economy.
Also read: El Salvador’s Bitcoin Gamble: A Nation’s High-Stakes Bet
El Salvador’s latest fiscal amnesty is yet another attempt by President Bukele’s administration to alleviate the financial burden on its citizens and stabilize the economy. However, as the country navigates its complex economic landscape, it remains to be seen whether these measures will drive long-term growth and prosperity. With public opinion increasingly focused on financial issues, Bukele’s next steps will be critical in shaping El Salvador’s future.
