Mexico’s Critics Unmask Emilia Perez Cultural Gaps and Faux Diversity
A growing wave of criticism contends that “Emilia Pérez,” the French-produced musical comedy about a Mexican cartel boss’s transition, fails to authentically capture Mexico’s culture. Detractors point to limited Mexican casting, flawed Spanish, and superficial portrayals that shortchange a rich national identity.
The Controversial Setting and Underrepresented Mexican Talent
“Emilia Pérez” has become an awards-season juggernaut, earning an impressive four Golden Globes and capturing industry headlines with talk of potential Oscar glory. On paper, it boasts elements seemingly ripe for success: an underworld premise, bold themes involving gender identity, and a star-studded cast featuring Karla Sofía Gascón, Zoé Saldaña, and Selena Gomez. Yet many Mexican audiences and critics see a glaring contradiction in its triumphant narrative—namely that it claims to depict “their” culture while being written, directed, and largely performed by non-Mexicans.
At first glance, the storyline—a notorious cartel capo named Juan “Manitas” del Monte who undergoes gender affirmation surgery and resurfaces as Emilia—lends itself to edgy humor and dramatic potential. The film’s comedic, music-laden approach tries to merge flamboyance with serious discussions about trans identity and the drug trade. From the eyes of many critics, the main problem comes from missing Mexican voices at the creative heart. Jacques Audiard ‒ the film’s French director and writer ‒ says he doesn’t speak Spanish well and hasn’t spent much time in Mexico. This fact alone makes people wonder how deeply he might show a culture that isn’t his.
While trans actress Karla Sofía Gascón is indeed Spanish-speaking, she is Spanish rather than Mexican, and her background does not negate the broader absence of Mexican perspective. The other leading women—Selena Gomez (an American of partial Mexican heritage who has long been open about her struggles with Spanish fluency) and Zoé Saldaña (an American actress with Dominican and Puerto Rican roots)—heighten the sense of cultural detachment. “Emilia Pérez” tells a story that seems Mexican but uses French movie making styles ‒ filming entirely in Paris not in any real Mexican place. Many people feel this choice very annoying because it overlooks the rich details and depth of true Mexican life.
Additionally, awarding multiple prizes to a film that some call an “outsider’s fantasy” about Mexico fuels the debate around cultural appropriation. The director’s defenders argue that any artist should be free to create a parallel reality, but Mexican critics say this is not a mere matter of artistic license—it is about representation and historical power dynamics. For them, “Emilia Pérez” recycles the worst tendencies of a system that routinely sidelines local talent, watering down a country’s identity into simplistic tropes.
Why the Criticism Over Language and Culture Holds Merit
One of the film’s most glaring shortcomings, as pointed out by notable Mexican actor-comedian Eugenio Derbez and others on social media, concerns the cast’s inconsistent Spanish. Selena Gomez, for instance, plays Jessi Del Monte, the embattled wife of the main character before the transition. Critics have found her Spanish unconvincing, describing it as halting or noticeably accented in ways that deviate strongly from any typical Mexican region. Meanwhile, Gascón admits to feeling considerable fear about “getting the accent right,” revealing a self-awareness that her portrayal, if botched, might seem laughable to Mexican ears.
The problem goes beyond awkward pronunciation. In multiple interviews, various cast members and even director Jacques Audiard himself seemed unable to articulate the historical or social nuances that a story about a Mexican cartel boss ordinarily requires. Those offended highlight that the film’s comedic tone might trivialize the very real violence that organized crime inflicts on Mexico. Narco-culture has wreaked havoc across entire regions, so comedic songs about drug lords, performed by foreign actors who are not conversant with local circumstances, strikes many as insensitive or out of touch.
Yes, comedic or stylized approaches to serious topics can yield powerful art, but many believe “Emilia Pérez” does not go about it with the necessary care. Instead of delving into the ramifications of narcotraffic or exploring Mexico’s complex relationship with trans identity, critics say it glosses over them, focusing on flamboyant set pieces, catchy songs, and flamboyant comedic beats. This may entertain some international audiences but comes off as superficial to Mexican viewers, who see their reality caricatured for commercial gain.
In terms of cultural specificity, references in the dialogue or visual cues appear limited or generic, lacking the depth that might ground the story in real Mexican communities. Even small details such as local idiomatic expressions or region-specific mannerisms appear absent, replaced by a sort of universal Hollywood Spanish. The result is a film that feels unmoored from the cultural anchor it professes to celebrate. Detractors say a truly thoughtful approach might have involved filming on Mexican soil, involving local researchers, or casting predominantly Mexican actors in central roles, especially for a story about a Mexican cartel figure. Yet none of these steps were prioritized.
In an era when viewers are becoming more discerning about authenticity—particularly around stories that reference marginalized communities or countries frequently misrepresented in popular media—these language and culture gaps loom large. That “Emilia Pérez” triumphed at awards shows like the Golden Globes, or garnered top BAFTA recognition, illustrates to critics a systemic problem: primarily non-Mexican decision-makers celebrating a version of Mexico that, ironically, many Mexicans do not recognize.
French Direction and Foreign Glamour Versus True Mexican Identity
Another facet fueling public frustration is the marketing emphasis on a European auteur’s “vision.” Jacques Audiard is a respected director who has earned accolades with projects such as “A Prophet” and “Dheepan,” but the question arises: how does his skill in French cinema equate to credible storytelling about Mexican realities? While the film’s backers and stars argue that creativity is borderless, Mexican voices concerned with preserving cultural integrity see a cautionary tale in “Emilia Pérez.” If success on the festival circuit requires a French lens, shot in Paris, and performed largely by outsiders, then what does that say about the global film industry’s appetite for authentic Mexican stories told by Mexicans themselves?
This dynamic has historical precedents. The entertainment industry repeatedly shows that “global audiences” accept stylized portrayals of “exotic” locales, as long as they adhere to broad stereotypes or comfortably distanced comedic sketches. Meanwhile, the nuanced context that local creators could provide often goes ignored or labeled “niche.” In “Emilia Pérez,” comedic musical sequences take precedence, overshadowing deeper analyses of how real Mexican communities experience violence, or how trans individuals navigate highly conservative social spaces. That disconnect resonates with critics who believe the film’s flamboyance is overshadowing real issues.
Still, not everyone is upset. Some fans praise “Emilia Pérez” for shining a spotlight on trans representation. Actress Karla Sofía Gascón emphasizes that this role is a personal triumph, allowing her to showcase the journeys of trans women on a grand cinematic stage. And yes, representation for trans stories remains scarce in mainstream film, so any glimmer of inclusivity might be welcomed by a portion of the public. The broader question, however, is whether such representation inadvertently becomes tokenistic or overshadowed by sensational comedic beats and by an “outsider’s fantasy” approach to Mexico’s complexities.
Critics also highlight how the film’s superficial portrayals run the risk of trivializing violence. By turning organized crime elements into a flamboyant comedic narrative, the film arguably flattens the real tragedies happening on the ground in Mexico. To be sure, comedic musicals can tackle serious themes adeptly—one can point to historical examples of satire or black comedy that deliver incisive commentary. Yet the friction arises when “Emilia Pérez” attempts to do so with minimal local involvement, leaving out the depth that might lend comedic artistry a sense of ethical grounding.
Awards Success Amid Online Backlash
Defenders of “Emilia Pérez” say the film’s trophy haul—four Golden Globes, a standout presence on BAFTA longlists, and heavy Oscar buzz—proves its merit. But for many Mexicans, that success underscores Hollywood’s age-old pattern of rewarding exoticized portrayals of non-Western cultures. Observers question how authentic accolades can be if they ignore mounting criticism from Mexican audiences who feel shortchanged by the way their identity is on display.
Netflix bought the movie in a big money deal ‒ about $12 million ‒ for rights in the U.S. and U.K. They spent a lot on ads. Their campaign it seems, cleverly handled hot topics: the funny musical take on cartel violence, the maybe-not-real Spanish dialogue and questions about trans identity. The streaming giant adopted a “sorority strategy,” spotlighting Karla Sofía Gascón, Zoé Saldaña, and Selena Gomez as the empowered trio forging a new comedic dynamic. This unified front, critics argue, glosses over the glaring absence of a genuine Mexican vantage point.
Choosing to shoot only in France ‒ with sets and crews barely linked to Mexico ‒ shows a bigger problem. Movie makers probably say this is due to money or planning reasons but it always separates the story from the place it says it happens. Some see it as part of the film’s “charm,” an intentionally whimsical approach that merges Parisian aesthetics with a stylized “Mexican” script. Others view it as cultural inauthenticity at best, or a disturbing signal that the film industry still believes it can conjure a passable Mexico from thousands of miles away without local accountability.
On social media, as well as in statements from national celebrities like Eugenio Derbez, the chorus of disapproval grows. They highlight the disconnect between the mainstream awards circuit’s praise and the actual experiences of people in Mexico who look for accurate, respectful representation. The use of a trans narrative arc for a comedic “redemption” of a murderous drug lord also strikes many as insensitive, particularly at a time when trans communities remain vulnerable to real-life violence and discrimination.
Ultimately, “Emilia Pérez” has soared to the top of multiple awards races, but the tension between that success and the pushback from segments of the Mexican community illustrates how easily the global film industry can sidestep local authenticity. If awarding bodies predominantly consist of foreign, or at least non-Mexican, members, then the voices from within Mexico may not carry as much weight in final voting decisions. Meanwhile, the film garners more momentum, overshadowing smaller, more accurate representations of Mexico that might never reach the same platform.
To sum up “Emilia Pérez” shows Hollywood’s ongoing ignorance about true cultural stories. Art should explore themes from different places but ignoring local views might create something that feels empty or maybe even rude to the culture it tries to show. By assembling a cast largely unconnected to Mexico, filming in France, and employing comedic show tunes that deflate serious issues, “Emilia Pérez” has raised eyebrows among those who see it as a shallow appropriation rather than genuine homage.
Critics’ charges that the film underrepresents Mexican artists, misuses the Spanish language, and trivializes the complexities of narcoculture carry substantial weight. When the Golden Globes and other awards celebrate “Emilia Pérez” for flamboyant entertainment while ignoring the film’s questionable authenticity, it underscores an industry dynamic that places hype and global appeal over local truth. In a moment when authenticity has become a rallying cry worldwide, the success of “Emilia Pérez” signals that we have a long road ahead before mainstream cinema consistently champions culturally respectful storytelling.
For those who applaud the trans representation and comedic elements, the film may indeed be a leap forward in some areas. But that does not negate the glaring disconnect between its awards-driven narrative of empowerment and the critiques from Mexicans who find the portrayal unrecognizably shallow. If audiences and awards bodies truly want progress, they must heed the criticisms—recognizing that bridging cultural divides demands more than sprinkling in Spanish dialogue or touting a single Spanish-speaking star. It requires genuine engagement with the history, communities, and realities that a film aims to depict.
Thus, the best measure of “Emilia Pérez” may not be the trophies it accumulates, but rather how it sparks a larger reckoning about who gets to tell Mexican stories, how they tell them, and why authenticity still matters. In a story based in Mexico ‒ with a trans character ‒ the noticeable lack of Mexican participation and the use of foreign directors show missed chances. In many discussions about representation, the struggle sits in finding a balance between artistic freedom and cultural respect. The balance looks uneven.
Yes, “Emilia Pérez” has soared through the awards gauntlet, but perhaps the backlash and ongoing dialogue about its flaws might push the industry toward more inclusive productions in the future. If the world can grow to appreciate Mexico’s rich narratives told by its own filmmakers, employing local dialects and vantage points, then maybe the next time a trans storyline or cartel premise emerges, it will resonate more truthfully. Mexico has countless storytellers who might craft these narratives with the nuance and authenticity they deserve. That remains the crux of the argument: critics want to see Mexican culture portrayed by Mexican voices and talent, not relegated to cameo or side note status while foreign filmmakers reap the accolades.
Until that day arrives—until the system fosters truly collaborative and respectful ways to represent Mexico’s multi-layered reality—films like “Emilia Pérez” will keep generating controversy. Even if it claims to champion trans individuals and comedic creativity, the overshadowing sense is that it approaches Mexico’s identity as a malleable set piece. The film’s defenders might dismiss that stance as overly purist or closed-minded. However, from an opinion rooted in the best interests of authentic representation, one must side with the critics who see “Emilia Pérez” as an emblem of an industry that still struggles to engage local realities, choosing instead the more comfortable illusions of grand showbiz spectacle.
If that spectacle leads to an Oscar, as some now predict, the debate will intensify. Mexican audiences and their allies might be forced to watch a stylized fantasy crowned by the global film community while local voices fume at the dissonance. At the very least, we can hope that the attention “Emilia Pérez” receives will shine a spotlight on deeper issues—highlighting the need for real involvement of Mexican talent in stories about Mexico, better linguistic immersion, and a deeper grasp of local cultures. If not, the show will go on, awarding glitzy musicals that turn the complexities of a nation into background color for universal entertainment.
In the end, critics calling out underrepresented Mexican cast members, questionable Spanish accents, and meager cultural authenticity are correct to do so. Their criticisms probably won’t stop the film from getting awards ‒ but they reveal the conflict between shallow success and real representation. Fans of the funny show might say that “Emilia Pérez” never tried to be like a documentary. Any movie that uses Mexico’s identity has a weight ‒ it needs at least some respect for the background. This film, unfortunately, seems to have missed that mark, even if it dazzles voters and audiences who remain distant from the lived experiences of actual Mexican communities.
From an artistic standpoint, perhaps “Emilia Pérez” is not entirely lacking in merit. The comedic numbers, the star power of Selena Gomez and Zoé Saldaña, the confident presence of Karla Sofía Gascón—these attributes might amuse and intrigue global viewers. Yet from an ethical perspective, especially as the conversation about inclusivity and authenticity becomes ever more central in entertainment, the film stands as a cautionary tale. Mexico’s identity deserves a direct voice, not one overshadowed by foreign direction, minimal local input, and a language performance that rings hollow to native ears.
Also Read: Mexican Artists That Shined Bright in 2024
Therefore, the critics who argue that the film is a pastel-hued mirage—failing to present Mexico as it truly is—have a case well worth heeding. Perhaps in future awards cycles, when audiences and industry gatekeepers reflect on the film’s ultimate legacy, the biggest takeaway will not be about the flamboyant show tunes or comedic flair. Instead, it will be about the impetus to ask for more from stories claiming to represent an entire nation and culture. If “Emilia Pérez” unwittingly serves as a spark for that broader reckoning, then the criticism it has faced will be more than justified—it will have served a purpose in pushing the global film arena toward genuine inclusivity and respect.
