Costa Rican Alajuelense Challenges FIFA Over Cup Rules

After a contentious selection process for the upcoming Club World Cup, Costa Rican giants Liga Deportiva Alajuelense have taken FIFA to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, alleging rule breaches over ownership ties among Mexican clubs, signaling a legal showdown.
Allegations of Rule-Breaking in the Club World Cup
Liga Deportiva Alajuelense—one of Costa Rica’s most storied football clubs—has initiated legal proceedings against FIFA in a dramatic twist to the build-up for this summer’s Club World Cup. The club contends that including two Mexican teams under the same ownership violates the governing body’s competition regulations. According to documents filed with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), Alajuelense’s legal team argues that the presence of Club de Fútbol Pachuca and Club León, both owned by the Pachuca Group, breaches Article 10.1 of FIFA’s competition rules. This article explicitly states that to preserve the integrity of the competition, no participating club may “hold or deal in the securities or shares of any other club.”
Alajuelense’s complaint, first formally submitted to FIFA on January 16, alleges that this ownership conflict gives an unfair advantage to the Mexican clubs, effectively blocking Alajuelense from a rightful place in the tournament. “We believe that one of the two Mexican clubs should be disqualified,” said a representative of Alajuelense in a statement corroborated by The Sunday Times. “Our case is not just about a spot at the Club World Cup—it’s about upholding the principles of fair play and transparency in international football.”
The controversy stems from a change to the Club World Cup, which will occur in its new 32-team format in the United States from June 14 to July 13. Teams like Chelsea and Manchester City will take part in this event. A challenge from Alajuelense has sparked heated talks between football officials, legal experts, and supporters.
A Deep Dive Into FIFA’s Regulations
At the heart of the dispute lies a FIFA rule that limits cross-team ownership to protect fair competition between clubs. Article 10.1 is designed to keep the playing field level by prohibiting any club from holding stakes in another. Alajuelense argues that by allowing both Pachuca and León to compete—given that they share common ownership—the governing body is effectively undermining this principle.
According to interviews with legal experts cited by The Sunday Times, this issue is not merely academic. “A link between clubs in finances or operations creates unfair competition,” a sports law specialist said. “The FIFA rules stop this conflict, and weak enforcement sets bad examples.”
FIFA replied to Alajuelense’s first complaint with a notice on November 22. The response stated that the club could lack status as a formal party in future investigations. The unclear message left Alajuelense unhappy, so the club filed another complaint on November 27. Their legal team has since filed an appeal with CAS, arguing that FIFA is in breach of its own rules and that the club has suffered a “denial of justice” by being excluded from the process.
The Sunday Times has exclusive insights from talks with football regulatory experts who believe this case could change everything. “A club’s direct court challenge against FIFA happens very rarely,” one expert said. “Small clubs feel left out from top-level sports decisions, or they will take similar action.” The matter shows how much clubs want proof that FIFA makes fair decisions and treats all competitors equally.
The Impact on International Football Competitions
The legal dispute changes many areas of soccer besides the Club World Cup case. International matches need FIFA’s rules along with the trust from players and teams. Any doubts about tournament selections by clubs could weaken the base that supports all international competitions.
For Costa Rican football, this case is especially significant. Alajuelense is a national icon and one of the region’s most competitive teams on the continental stage. Participation in the Club World Cup offers a chance to display talent or bring acknowledgment to Costa Rican football. However, the club states that FIFA’s failure to address the conflict of interest will deny it its deserved spot. “We fight for our place on the international stage,” said an Alajuelense lawyer to The Sunday Times. “A fair competition needs equal chances for each club.”
The dispute creates different reactions in football circles. Mexican clubs with large fan bases show mixed views. Some support the Pachuca Group’s business approach and say cross-ownership adds financial balance. Others view it as power misuse that affects fair competition. The issue sparks debates in Latin American sports media, where experts question FIFA’s rules for modern club ownership.
The effects spread to more tournaments. A CAS ruling for Alajuelense would force FIFA to reexamine participation rules. A few clubs could start legal cases to seek accurate rule interpretations. These adjustments would reshape future events to match the basic structure of international club football.
A deeper discussion exists about money in sports. People who oppose the current system say business interests harm the game’s fundamental values. “Football needs to focus on skill or hard work next to fair competition,” a Sunday Times sports writer noted. “When money decides tournament spots, the sport loses its meaning.”
The Legal and Economic Stakes Ahead
For Alajuelense, the legal battle matters for clear reasons. The club states that its regional rank, along with athletic success, should give it a spot in the Club World Cup ‒ a contest that brings major money as well as prestige. The dispute centers on how two Mexican clubs with the same owner block a team that earned its place through performance.
A win for Alajuelense at CAS would have notable effects. FIFA would need to remove one Mexican club from the event, which would let Alajuelense join. The ruling would mark a key point that proves the need for strict rules or fair contests. “A win for Alajuelense stands for fair play,” said a club legal advisor to The Sunday Times.
The case results could affect Latin American football finances. The Club World Cup attracts sponsors’ media deals and attention. Small clubs that participate in such events gain vital funds or notice. But if the current setup stays, rich clubs with complex owners could keep control of these contests.
These legal fights shape how people see FIFA. Past claims of wrongdoing hurt the group’s image. A respected Costa Rican club that fights FIFA’s choices in public could fix trust or add doubt. “FIFA needs to use its rules the same way,” said a sports law expert to The Sunday Times. “If not all international football faces risk.”
The case draws the attention of clubs, investors, and fans. It has started discussions about new rules for group ownership, foreign money, and business in sports. Until the final choice is made, one fact stays clear: this fight will change how future football events work.
A Look at the Road Ahead for Global Football
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has started hearing the case as FIFA faces pressure to make changes. For Alajuelense, this ruling means more than a legal win—it shows that small clubs from less-known football nations can challenge unfair methods. The club leaders say they fight for all levels of the sport, not just themselves.
The Sunday Times spoke to key people in football who shared mixed views. A top football expert said, “This case marks a key moment. A CAS ruling for Alajuelense would make FIFA adjust its rules about club ownership along with competition entry.” A second source told The Sunday Times the verdict could lead other clubs to question current rules. “The sport may shift toward a system where fans or players matter more than money deals.”
But problems exist. Modern football includes clubs owned by big companies, which makes legal choices hard. The Pachuca Group owns Pachuca as well as León. These companies succeed by sharing resources between teams. A ban based on ownership could start new discussions about business in sports.
The legal test gives FIFA a risk or chance. A verdict for Alajuelense would push the group to set strict rules. A ruling that backs FIFA would keep things the same, which small clubs dislike. “This choice will support or change a system many think helps rich or famous clubs,” a high-level source told The Sunday Times.
Also Read: Richard Ríos Believes Colombia Can Lead the Path to Glory
A lot depends on the coming Club World Cup, which will host top matches this summer. Teams from Europe, Asia, Africa, or the Americas will meet in the United States to play elite club football. For Costa Rica’s Alajuelense, participation in this event is not just about prestige—it is about asserting their rightful place in a global arena that has, until now, been dominated by clubs with more resources and complex ownership structures.