Aztecs Still Speak After Conquest, As Empires Fall Apart Today

The so-called fall of the Aztecs in 1521 was never a clean break. However, a violent transformation whose survivors still speak Nahuatl, remember Tenochtitlán, and challenge simple stories of conquest that erase Indigenous power, resilience, and Latin American perspectives today.

Rethinking Collapse Through Aztec Eyes

From a distance, the Spanish conquest of the Aztec world looks like one of history's most brutal before-and-after snapshots: in 1519, a powerful imperial state ruling central Mexico; by 1521, its capital in ruins and its rulers dead or displaced. The shorthand version is tidy, and for a long time it has suited the needs of empire and textbook alike: a small band of Spanish conquistadors conquering a vast Indigenous polity almost overnight. But as historians speaking to BBC History point out, that story hides as much as it reveals, especially if we are willing to ask what "collapse" really means from a Latin American perspective.

In conversation with BBC History on its HistoryExtra podcast, historian Caroline Dodds Pennock and collapse scholar Luke Kemp insist that the apparent speed of the Aztec imperial breakdown should not be mistaken for cultural extinction. The imperial system did fall with jaw‑dropping rapidity, and Pennock calls it "one of the fastest collapses of an enormous empire that exists in history." Yet they argue that the very word "collapse" is loaded. It suggests a complete disappearance, a void after a catastrophe, when in fact millions of people kept living, speaking, farming, praying, writing, and negotiating under radically altered conditions. For a region long accustomed to being described as "fallen" or "failed," from colonial chronicles to modern talk of "narco‑states," that distinction matters.

Burning Books, Silencing Voices, Reshaping Memory

One of the most significant obstacles to understanding Aztec society on its own terms is that much of its voice was deliberately burned away. As Pennock explains to BBC History, most Aztec records were destroyed almost immediately after the conquest began in 1519. When Spanish forces finally took Tenochtitlán in 1521, colonial authorities oversaw the systematic burning of codices and administrative texts, unleashing what she describes as "a huge destruction of this vast pictographic culture," including "incredible legal records, religious records, political records." The devastation, she notes, has been likened to "the conflagration of the Library of Alexandria."

What survived, in both written and material form, passes essentially through Spanish hands: missionary chronicles, legal petitions framed to please colonial judges, and archaeological remains interpreted through later eyes. That bias has long shaped how the Aztecs were portrayed, as bloodthirsty, doomed, or stagnant. More recent work in journals such as the Journal of Latin American Studies, Ethnohistory, and Hispanic American Historical Review has tried to push past those filters, treating pictorial manuscripts, Indigenous testimonies, and cityscapes as sophisticated archives rather than exotic curiosities.

Seen this way, the Aztec world in 1519 looks nothing like a failing polity waiting to be toppled. As Pennock recounts for BBC History, the empire "stretched across about 80,000 square miles … ruling over 5 to 6 million people in over 500 allied and subject cities." At its heart stood Tenochtitlán, an island city in what is now Mexico City with perhaps 200,000 inhabitants. Elevated causeways and aqueducts stitched it to the mainland. Vast markets drew traders from across Mesoamerica. A monumental sacred precinct anchored ritual and political life. The city was a center of poetry, philosophy, and art, and a hub, in Pennock's words, of "relative gender egalitarianism, compared to most societies of that period."

Archaeologists writing in Latin American Antiquity have emphasized how densely planned and hydraulically engineered this world was, from chinampa farming systems to causeways and dikes. It was a society facing internal tensions and external rivals, yet also complex, expansionist, and confident. Nothing about 1519 looked like a society already on the brink of implosion.

From Imperial Ruin To Indigenous Survival

So why did such an empire fall so quickly? The conquest, from the first sustained contact in 1519 to the fall of Tenochtitlán in 1521, unfolded at extraordinary speed. BBC History highlights several converging forces. The most devastating was the disease. Smallpox reached central Mexico early in the campaign, racing ahead of Spanish troops into communities with no prior exposure. Entire families died within days, and political leaders were cut down at a moment when steady guidance was desperately needed. That demographic shock weakened resistance long before some towns ever saw a Spanish face.

At the same time, long‑standing resentments within the imperial structure proved decisive. Dozens of subject and rival city‑states chose to ally with the newcomers, calculating that Spanish arms might help them loosen Tenochtitlán's grip and its heavy tribute demands. These alliances provided the conquistadors with tens of thousands of Indigenous soldiers; without them, as many historians in the Hispanic American Historical Review have underlined, the conquest would almost certainly have failed. Very different diplomatic and military norms also shaped early encounters. Aztec leaders interpreted the Spaniards through existing frameworks of alliance, reciprocity, and ritual warfare, while the Europeans pursued annihilationist tactics. Misread signals in those first months amplified the danger, giving the invaders further advantages precisely when disease and internal tensions were biting hardest.

Yet even if we account for pathogens, politics, and misjudgment, Pennock argues through BBC History that the story remains incomplete if we treat 1521 as an ending rather than a hinge. The more difficult question is what happened to the people the empire once ruled. If the imperial structure "collapsed," what lived on? This invites the audience to explore the ongoing stories of resilience and adaptation that continue to shape Indigenous communities today, fostering curiosity and engagement.

Here, the language of collapse begins to fray. Pennock warns that the term risks implying that Aztec culture vanished. "A million people still speak the Aztec language of Nahuatl in Mexico today," she notes, stressing that "much of their culture continues" and that "their society remains vibrant, even in the face of devastating disease, warfare, and enslavement." The empire fell; the people adapted. Nahua communities reorganized under colonial rule, used Spanish courts to defend land, re-mapped sacred spaces onto churches and plazas, and kept stories alive in new genres. This demonstrates the resilience and ongoing cultural survival that can inspire a sense of hope and continuity in the audience.

For Luke Kemp, whose comparative work on societal breakdown is highlighted by BBC History, this is part of a wider pattern. Fortunes, he explains, "can often turn very quickly, and very unforeseeably," and most societies "didn't foresee that they were going through a collapse." From his perspective, "many of the challenges faced by these past collapsed societies are reflected in our own. Things like competition, warfare, climate change, internal rebellion, inequality, and poor leadership. These are all things that have happened throughout history, and different societies have had different ways of dealing with these – for better and for worse."

For Latin America today, those words hit close to home. The region wrestles with climate shocks, extractive economies, democratic backsliding, and deep inequality, problems that can feel apocalyptic if we imagine "collapse" as an absolute end. The Aztec experience, as reframed by BBC History's conversation, suggests a different lesson. States can fall with shocking speed; cultures, languages, and memories often endure, reshape themselves, and speak back.

Walk across Mexico City, and you move through those layers. Under the concrete, the stones of Tenochtitlán; above them, baroque churches and bureaucratic towers; in the streets, vendors and families who still use Nahuatl words every day. The imperial Aztec state is gone, but the people who built it remain part of Latin America's present, not just its past. To call that story a "collapse" is to risk missing its most important truth: that empires may topple, but the voices below them do not fall silent so easily.

Also Read: Trump’s War Talk Pulls Mexico and Colombia into Crosshairs Again