Argentina’s Soccer Clubs at a Crossroads: Balancing Tradition and Privatization
As Argentina moves toward allowing private sports corporations (SADs) into its soccer leagues, member-owned clubs’ historical and social significance must be carefully weighed. The shift could alter the fabric of Argentine soccer and its impact on communities.
The Argentine government has recently taken significant steps to integrate private sports corporations (SADs) into its soccer leagues, sparking a heated debate over the sport’s future in the country. On Tuesday, Argentina’s General Judicial Inspection Board (IGJ) issued a regulation based on President Javier Milei’s December 2023 decree, which allowed SADs to compete in Argentina’s top division. This regulation, set to take effect on November 1, 2024, permits the coexistence of nonprofit civil associations and private sports corporations in Argentine soccer.
The ruling highlights the possibility for clubs to transform from nonprofit entities into private corporations, which aims to streamline processes for institutions wishing to invest in the market. However, this shift has been met with considerable resistance, especially from the Argentine Soccer Association (AFA) and many clubs and fans who cherish the traditional member-owned model.
AFA’s Resistance and the Fight Against SADs
The Argentine Soccer Association (AFA) has staunchly opposed the introduction of SADs since Milei proposed the idea during his 2023 presidential campaign. The AFA’s statutes mandate that its member clubs operate as nonprofit civil associations. This decree would challenge the very foundation of Argentine soccer, potentially making the AFA’s ban on private corporations illegal.
Most Argentine soccer clubs, deeply embedded in the community and cultural fabric, would need to amend their bylaws to switch to the private model. In November 2023, an AFA vote revealed that most members were against changing these inner rulings. For a club to become a SAD, its members must vote for the change with a three-quarters supermajority. So far, this idea has faced widespread rejection from clubs and fans alike.
In the legal landscape, a presidential decree holds the same weight as a national law, superseding the bylaws of specific organizations. If the AFA continues to resist making the necessary changes to allow SADs, the issue will likely escalate to the courts.
The Broader Implications of Privatizing Argentine Soccer
The push to privatize Argentine soccer comes when the nation’s men’s national team is riding a wave of success, having won four straight international titles, including the 2024 Copa America. Most leaders would bask in the glory of such achievements, but President Milei has instead reignited his campaign against the AFA, advocating for SADs as the future of Argentine soccer.
Milei argues that the best players come from privately owned teams, pointing to the success of Argentine players in European clubs. However, this argument oversimplifies the complexities of soccer management and talent development. The presence of Argentine players in top European clubs is more a reflection of economic disparities than an endorsement of the management models.
Whether privately owned or member-owned, European clubs have far greater financial resources than their Argentine counterparts. For instance, Ángel Di María plays for Portugal’s SL Benfica, a member-owned club whose professional soccer team is managed by a club-owned company. Lionel Messi, one of Argentina’s greatest players, spent most of his career at FC Barcelona, another member-owned club.
The Unique Role of Argentine Soccer Clubs
Argentine soccer clubs are more than just sports teams; they are pivotal community institutions that play a crucial societal role. They provide safe spaces for children to play, learn, and grow, often offering refuge from the harsh realities of life. Deeply rooted in neighborhoods, these clubs are fundamental to the country’s rich soccer culture and talent development.
Privatizing these clubs could significantly undermine their social and cultural roles. Smaller neighborhood clubs, breeding grounds for top talents like Ángel Di María and Alexis MacAllister, could be lost. The potential commercialization of these clubs could lead to scenarios where clubs are relocated, rebranded, or even dissolved if they do not align with investors’ interests.
Argentina’s soccer history is filled with clubs that have faced economic struggles yet continued to thrive due to their deep community ties. For example, seven-time Copa Libertadores winners Independiente had to organize a fundraiser to pay their debts in 2023. Despite financial difficulties, the member-owned model has ensured that clubs remain integral to their communities.
Weighing the Risks and Benefits
The debate over SADs in Argentine soccer reflects broader global sports management and ownership trends. While privatization can bring financial stability and professional management, it also poses risks to the cultural and social fabric of the sport. The experience of clubs in other countries offers mixed results.
In Uruguay and Chile, where private sports corporations were introduced, teams did not necessarily outperform Argentine member-owned clubs on the international stage. In contrast, the German Bundesliga, which limits private investors to holding no more than 49% of any club’s stake, boasts high fan attendance and satisfaction, outperforming many exclusively privately owned leagues in Europe.
Moreover, the English Premier League, often cited as a model of successful privatization, has seen multiple instances where fans have demanded a return to a model that includes more fan participation in decision-making processes. The controversy surrounding clubs like Cardiff City and Wimbledon FC, which faced drastic changes under private ownership, serves as a cautionary tale.
Conclusion: Balancing Tradition and Innovation
As Argentina contemplates the future of its soccer clubs, it is essential to balance financial viability and preserve the cultural and social roles these clubs play. Privatization should not come at the expense of the community bonds and traditions that make Argentine soccer unique.
President Milei’s push for SADs represents a significant shift in the management of soccer clubs that requires careful consideration and broad consensus. The AFA and soccer clubs must navigate this transition thoughtfully, ensuring that any changes benefit the sport and its fans.
Also read: FIFA’s Zero Tolerance on Racism: Should Argentina Forfeit Copa America Title?
In this pivotal moment, all stakeholders must engage in open dialogue, weighing the potential benefits of privatization against the risks of losing the essence of what makes Argentine soccer so unique. The sport can thrive only through a balanced approach while honoring its rich heritage and maintaining its deep-rooted connection to the community.
