Ecuador Film Finds Humor in Midlife, Family, and What Men Avoid Saying

At forty, a man loses his job and suddenly hears time louder. In Ecuador’s new film Nosotros, Mi Papá y El Perro, laughter is the entry point, not the escape, into grief, family friction, and the uneasy work of growing older together.

A House Full of Time, and a Dog Watching Everything

In the movie, the house is not just a setting. It is an atmosphere you can almost feel on your skin, the kind of closed-in air that gathers when several lives are forced into the same rooms, the same routines, the same old arguments that keep finding new words. A father and his sons move around each other with the particular stiffness of Latin family life when affection is real but not always spoken clearly. And there, padding through the days, is the dog.

The dog is an adult, nearing the end of its life. It is not a cute accessory or a gag machine. It is a presence, quiet and stubborn, the kind that makes you notice the small rhythms of a household: a bowl set down, a pause before someone speaks, the way people check on an animal without saying what they are really checking on. The trouble is that the dog is never only a dog. In this story, it carries memory.

Pablo Arturo Suárez, the producer and director, describes the film as a mirror of something that sits in plain view yet remains mostly unspoken: the male midlife crisis. “This film in particular is very tied to masculine dynamics within the family,” he told EFE, framing it as a reflection of how men move through that stage. He also points to the women in the story as the ones who see the line more clearly. The female characters, he said, “have things super clear and help steer” everything, he told EFE.

What this does is shift the usual focus. Instead of treating midlife doubt as a private breakdown, the film pins it to the family table. It makes it communal. It makes it unavoidable.

Forty, Unemployed, and Staring at a Teenage Future

The central character is Sebastián, who loses his job at forty and begins doing the math that so many people do in silence: what has been built, what has slipped away, what is still possible. The film is a comedy built over a dramatic undertow, and it uses that structure to keep the viewer close to the discomfort without drowning in it.

Sebastián is also a father, and the film places him in a clash that feels familiar across Latin America’s cities, where tradition and the digital present share the same living space. He pushes his adolescent son toward classical study, toward the old idea of a serious life. The son wants something else. He wants to be a YouTuber and live inside the digital world. Their argument is not only about career choices. It is about legitimacy. It is about whose version of adulthood counts.

The wager here is that audiences will recognize themselves in the gap between generations and recognize something else, too: how economic shock can make that gap sharper. Losing a job is not only a personal blow. It reorganizes authority inside a home. It changes who is listened to, who is deferred to, and who feels watched.

And ‘watched’ is the right word, because the film builds a character who is unseen yet shapes everything. The mother is dead, but she remains in the house through dialogue, grief, and memory. She is present in what the family cannot quite resolve. She is also, symbolically, present in the dog, the animal she brought home.

“An adult dog, in its last days, accompanies them, observes them and, symbolically, speaks of the passage of time,” Suárez explained, he told EFE. It is a simple device, yet not simple at all. A dog near the end of life forces people to confront endings in a way they cannot intellectualize away.

He emphasizes that “in the end, there are more points of meeting than of separation,” highlighting the importance of family bonds. He returns to that idea because families, especially in Latin America, often survive through overlap: shared spaces, shared histories, the repeated act of staying, fostering a sense of warmth and shared understanding for the audience.

Black Humor, Quito Streets, and the Long Journey of Making Film

Suárez leans on black humor, not as decoration, but as a strategy for saying what is hard to say. “There is no better way to talk about life than laughing,” he said, he told EFE. The line reads like a philosophy and also like a survival tool. In many Latin American homes, humor is not the opposite of pain. It is the language that pain is allowed to speak.

The director’s aim, as he describes it, is to reach a broad audience and use comedy to open debate about deeper matters: family relationships and age-related crises that people live through with little public vocabulary. “It is essential to talk about families because it is what marks us,” he said, he told EFE, pointing to the need to understand the other person inside the family, even when that other person is the one who makes you bristle.

The film, produced five years ago and set to premiere on February 5, carries an Ecuadorian specificity that does not feel like a marketing label. It presents Latin family dynamics through how people address each other, how they speak, how life stacks up when everyone lives under one roof, and the peculiar local jokes that come with the idiosyncrasy. That texture helped it travel, even to festivals outside the country. It has been awarded in the United States and Chile, a reminder that the most local family tensions often translate the farthest.

Except some scenes filmed in the coastal province of Manabí, the story unfolds in Quito. The city blends colonial streets with the pulse of modern neighborhoods, and the film treats it as an essential character, not a postcard. In a place like Quito, the past sits close to the present, and that closeness echoes the film’s central argument about generations living inside the same frame.

The cast includes Ecuadorian actors and actresses, as well as a Russian performer. The production was financed with the team’s own funds and sponsorships from private companies. This detail hangs over the project like a quiet condition of Ecuadorian filmmaking: resourcefulness is not optional.

Suárez, a creator of series and projects across documentary and fiction for television, releases his second feature film a decade after Tan distintos. He is thirty-nine now, and he describes that gap as proof of something larger than one career. Making cinema in Ecuador is a journey, he says, and the line lands because it is both personal and structural. In this region, films are often made the way families are held together: by persistence, by improvisation, and by the repeated decision not to let the story stop.

Also Read: Brazil’s El Agente Secreto Wins Big by Refusing Hollywood Imitation