Can Amazon “Superfoods” Save the Forest? Inside Belém’s Bid to Turn Biodiversity into a Bioeconomy

Belém’s new Bioeconomy Park hums with the sound of processors transforming rainforest fruits into powders bound for smoothie counters half a world away. As the BBC reports, Brazil is pitching this blooming “bioeconomy” as a climate-friendly engine of livelihoods and nutrition, but behind the optimism lies a tangle of questions about scale, safeguards, and what a global craze could mean for the Amazon.

From Lab Bench to Smoothie Bowl

Inside a renovated warehouse on the banks of Belém’s churning river, the air smells faintly of fruit pulp and machinery oil, a blend of jungle and laboratory. Technicians feed cupuaçu, taperebá, and bacaba into stainless-steel grinders. These fruits bruise and rot quickly, too fragile for extended supply chains. Freeze-drying turns them into powders, the kind you can ship, scoop, and market as the next miracle ingredient.

“There’s a lot of superfoods in the forest that people don’t know,” said Max Petrucci, founder of wellness brand Mahta, in an interview with the BBC. Swirling a gritty, cacao-colored drink, he framed his mission as a pairing of nutrition and justice. “We’re focused first on nutrition and the health benefits. The second goal is social and environmental,” he told the BBC, describing his promise of fair prices and sustainable sourcing.

The idea is simple: take fruits rich in antioxidants, fiber, and fatty acids that are too delicate for export, and make them shelf-stable. “We only sell powdered foods,” said Larissa Bueno, Mahta’s founder, explaining to the BBC that freeze-drying preserves nutrients while “keeping more economic value in Brazil.” Scientific literature on Amazon “superfoods” remains thin, the BBC noted, but the nutritional promise is real enough for a country searching for new ways to make the forest valuable without clearing it. As Petrucci said, “People have been eating from these forests for more than 10,000 years…there are many, many undiscovered superfoods.“

A Climate Strategy With Community Roots

The Amazon has always been a vast biological pantry, but decades of logging and land clearing have chewed into one of Earth’s great carbon sinks. Brazil’s emissions profile is unusual: most of its greenhouse gases come from land-use change and agriculture, not power plants or cars. That makes stopping deforestation the heart of its climate fight.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has pledged to halve forest loss by 2030, and in the twelve months to July 2025, deforestation fell to an eleven-year low, according to the BBC. But nearly 30 million Brazilians live in the Amazon basin, and appeals to planetary stewardship mean little when families struggle to afford necessities.

That tension is why the “bioeconomy” has become a national mantra. The goal is not just to preserve the forest but to use it wisely, to build industries around oils, fruits, medicines, and fibers that thrive in intact ecosystems. In the town of Apuí, one of the region’s most deforested areas, the idea takes the form of shade-grown coffee.

“We plant native Amazonian trees and the coffee together,” said Sarah Sampaio, who works with about 200 families transitioning from ranching to agroforestry. The trees cool the coffee and support household food crops. When a coffee plant dies, the young trees remain, slowly stitching the forest back together. Sampaio’s beans, light, fruity, shaped by the forest’s soil and humidity, have already ranked among Brazil’s top 30 coffees. “If we want to stop more trees from being chopped down, we have to provide people with an alternative income,” she told the BBC. Give people a reason to keep the forest standing, and the forest stands.

The Scalability Trap and the Açaí Paradox

But hidden inside this ideal is a warning. As long as açaí remains embedded within living forests, grown on small plots with other species, it reinforces biodiversity. If demand spikes too fast, however, monocultures creep in. A fruit once praised for saving the forest can start replacing it.

That contradiction is what experts call the scalability trap: when popularity becomes the enemy of sustainability. It is why “bioeconomy” dominated the discussion at UN climate meetings ahead of COP30 in Belém. “We need to move from a world dependent on fossil fuels, that is clear,” said Ana Yang, director at Chatham House’s Environment and Society Centre, in remarks shared by the BBC. “But not all bio-based transitions are good. If they destroy habitat or lack good social practices, they’re not solving the problem.“

Bioeconomy’s Bright Promise, and the Guardrails It Needs

Brazil’s ambitions are large. The BBC reports that the government wants to quadruple biofuels use by 2035 and drive global demand for forest-based foods, pharmaceuticals, and materials. Each goal carries opportunity, but each carries peril. Expanding sugarcane for ethanol could push farming into fragile zones. Demand for trendy fruits could trigger land grabs or push smallholders into exploitative contracts. Timber, oils, and fibers marketed as green could fuel new waves of extraction and displacement in Indigenous territories.

The overall lesson, woven through the BBC’s reporting, is that the bioeconomy is not inherently virtuous. It can regenerate or devastate, depending on the rules. The guardrails must be strong enough to keep profit aligned with protection, secure land tenure, careful planning, enforceable sustainability standards, and real benefit-sharing with Indigenous and riverine communities.

Back in Belém’s humming warehouse, the promise still feels tangible. Powders make fragile fruits economically viable. Shade-grown coffee stabilizes farm families while restoring canopy cover. Açaí cultivated in biodiverse forest mosaics sustains both athletes abroad and rural livelihoods at home.

But the stakes are high. The machines grinding cupuaçu and stabilizing taperebá are more than industrial equipment; they are a wager that science, Indigenous knowledge, and market appetite can converge fast enough to outpace chainsaws.

If they do, the Amazon’s future may taste not of loss, but of something vivid and unexpected, tart, sweet, and alive with possibility.

Also Read: De puerto colonial a foro global: cómo Santa Marta se convirtió en la voz de dos continentes