Argentina Hears Milei’s Capitalist Gospel as Evidence Enters the Classroom

Javier Milei told Argentine teenagers capitalism serves God while Marxism serves Satan. Religious texts, Latin American history and economic statistics offer a more complicated record, separating the moral foundations of markets from claims that prosperity follows automatically from spiritual obedience.

A Sermon Before the Bell

The students were 15 to 17. The speaker was their president, and the destination he described was paradise. At Buenos Aires’ ORT school on August 27, Javier Milei spent nearly 45 minutes connecting capitalism to divine law and Marxism to Satan, according to EFE.

His central promise was sweeping: “Material prosperity is the natural consequence of spiritual obedience.” This account presents third-party reporting and research, not an assessment or ranking of candidates or political parties.

Behind the religious language lies a recognizable institutional argument. Milei links prosperity to protection against theft, violence and deception. OECD economists similarly identify trust, predictable government and protection from state capture as conditions supporting investment. Their explanation, however, concerns functioning institutions, not evidence that any religion guarantees prosperity.

Religious sources themselves offer more than one economic prescription. Deuteronomy 15 requires periodic cancellation of debts among fellow Israelites and assistance to the poor. Those obligations sit alongside protections for property. The text contains duties for creditors as well as borrowers, not simply an instruction to leave existing ownership untouched.

Catholic teaching likewise distinguishes markets from unlimited economic freedom. In Centesimus Annus, John Paul II endorsed enterprise and private property within a legal framework serving human dignity. He also rejected the assumption that market forces alone would eliminate exclusion. The same document recognizes ethical contributions from people who profess no religion.

These are distinctions within religious thought, rather than evidence of a single economic program shared by all believers. Milei’s interpretation is his own; neither the Torah nor Catholic social teaching speaks with the voice of an Argentine economic ministry.

The Region Beyond the Binary

“Marx was a Satanist,” Milei asserted, EFE reported. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy describes something different: Marx understood religion as a human creation. His 1844 writing states, “Man makes religion, religion does not make man.” Neither that text nor the encyclopedia substantiates the allegation of devil worship.

Stanford’s account also records Marx’s admiration for capitalism’s technological achievements. His dispute concerned its social relations, exploitation and alienation. That does not establish that his proposed alternative works. It identifies the actual argument, which can be examined without accepting his conclusions or attributing supernatural motives.

Latin America supplies documented reasons to scrutinize revolutionary promises. Peru’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission attributed 54 percent of victim deaths reported to it to Shining Path, the Maoist insurgency. The commission examined Peru’s conflict between 1980 and 2000. It described a totalitarian project that disregarded human life. These were not merely technical economic mistakes.

The commission also documented systematic abuses by state forces and the racial exclusion that left rural Indigenous communities disproportionately exposed. Its findings assigned responsibility through evidence about organizations, decisions and victims, rather than dividing the dead between righteous and demonic camps.

For contemporary livelihoods, OECD research describes a different regional divide. Roughly 60 percent of Latin American workers are employed in firms with fewer than 10 employees, compared with less than 20 percent across OECD economies. About half of regional employment is informal.

Its diagnosis includes scarce credit, weak skills, limited technological diffusion and regulations that discourage growth. Mexico illustrates the complication: export success coexisted with stagnant aggregate productivity. For a small business, market access and the capacity to benefit from it are different problems. Religious affiliation does not measure either one.

The Numbers Outside the Classroom

Argentina’s figures also resist a single narrative. Fundar reports 30,633 fewer employers between November 2023 and May 2026, approximately 6 percent of the initial total. CEPA, using workplace insurance records, reports 411,613 fewer registered jobs. These are changes within a defined administrative universe, not a census of every livelihood.

Economist Hernán Bergstein told EFE that import competition, weaker demand and reduced public purchasing were damaging smaller businesses. Milei, in a separate interview reported by EFE, argued that overall employment had increased. The claims concern different measures: losses in registered jobs do not establish the direction of total employment, including informal work.

Meanwhile, INDEC’s survey of 31 urban areas put poverty at 28.2 percent in the second half of 2025, down from 31.6 percent in the first. That is a decline of 3.4 percentage points, not 3.4 percent. Average household income rose 18.3 percent while the basic consumption basket rose 11.3 percent.

The business and poverty series cover different periods and populations. They cannot simply cancel each other out. Nor can either isolate the effect of one policy, much less demonstrate spiritual causation. A household crossing a poverty threshold and a worker losing formal employment can inhabit the same economy.

Back at school, the relevant standard already exists in the government’s own language. Its December 2024 decree identified political indoctrination as a violation of children’s dignity, education and freedom of conscience. The accompanying announcement promised plural education and freedom of thought.

The reporting does not establish a legal finding that this lecture violated that decree. It leaves a question about its application: how much room did students have to question the connection between God, prosperity and presidential policy? The published sources contain competing interpretations and measurable outcomes. None supplies a statistical test for divine approval.

Also Read: Colombia’s Religious Freedom Depends on Keeping Presidential Power Firmly Secular